• @Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          4 years of security on a mid-range phone is okay, Bare minimum but it wouldn’t put me off buying one.

        • setVeryLoud(true);
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          That’s a nah from me. Beat Google / Apple at support or I’m not considering the product.

          • @Positronic@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            It costs less than any of Apple or Google’s offerings and they do not make money through software and services unlike Apple or Google. I think it’s unreasonable to expect 7 years or more of OS updates on a phone that costs $300-400. They should do better on their flagship though, it costs double but still has the same support.

            • setVeryLoud(true);
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              It’s still hardware in the trash in 4 years, regardless of cost to the end user. I intend to keep my Pixel 6 until it dies or runs out of security updates in 3 years, whichever comes first.

              • @Positronic@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                I don’t know if the hardware will be good enough in 4 years anyways. They’ve cut corners to get to that price point, the chip is similar to the 778G from 3 years back and it’s using UFS 2.2. Honestly the phone feels like it was made for India and the marketing indicates that. They don’t have many options with a clean OS and 3 years of OS updates at that price point there.

                • setVeryLoud(true);
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I don’t see why cheaper hardware would have to last less long, or even if it should, from an ethical and e-waste standpoint.