@RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agocloudfare badlemmy.mlimagemessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1324arrow-down1344
arrow-up1-20arrow-down1imagecloudfare badlemmy.ml@RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square116fedilink
minus-square@foggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•2 years agoThey have existed for over a decade wtf are you on about. They’re publicly traded and doing very well. This is more nonsense in a thread full of nonsense.
minus-square@planish@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink1•2 years agoThat suggests they’re less likely to try to frantically monitize in a way that risks killing their brand’s reputation. Maybe they’ll stay nice indefinitely.
minus-squareBoscoBearlinkfedilink1•1 year agoAnyone providing services for a profit could pull a Unity at anytime. Still, I think you need more for the “slippery slope” argument.
They have existed for over a decade wtf are you on about. They’re publicly traded and doing very well.
This is more nonsense in a thread full of nonsense.
That suggests they’re less likely to try to frantically monitize in a way that risks killing their brand’s reputation. Maybe they’ll stay nice indefinitely.
Anyone providing services for a profit could pull a Unity at anytime. Still, I think you need more for the “slippery slope” argument.