• @nottheengineer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -602 years ago

    How is pulling the entire image because of this acceptable in any way? Slap a fat warning on the site if you want, but don’t throw off people’s schedule by doing this.

    • @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      542 years ago

      Nah, I’m fine with this. This is the translation of the installer. It’s literally the first thing a new user sees. This cannot remain available for download.

    • @Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      452 years ago

      It’s their product. It doesn’t meet their standards, so they’re pulling the release to make changes.

      I highly doubt anybody’s workflow relies upon this specific version of Linux to operate. Might suck if you are missing out by not using the latest and greatest Linux distribution, but if you need this version and don’t have a service contract in place (do they even offer any?), it’s not on them to meet your expectations.

      • qupada
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        do they even offer any?

        On non-LTS releases? Almost certainly not.

        You’re 100% on the money, if a broken non-LTS release - which you can still upgrade to from an earlier release with do-release-upgrade, or install from the server ISO then apt install the UI - something has already gone horribly wrong, and a couple of days wait for a re-released ISO is by far the least of your problems.

    • @olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 years ago

      From the article: About 75% of the file is normal but the rest is a barrage of unsubtle, offensive sentences relating to politics, sexuality, and current events. The text is crude, provocative, and highly inflammatory – we’re not talking nuanced, fringe political opinions here.