• @9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They aren’t useless, but they are pretty broad strokes that will always have a use as long as we’re talking about any de facto two party states (e.g. those with FPTP voting systems).

      It’s also worth remembering that the population of one country’s idea of left wing politicians might actually end up being right wing elsewhere (for instance, people in the US saying their democratic party are lefty when in most of Europe they would be considered center-right or just plain right-wing).

      • @Prunebutt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        That’s not what makes the terms useful.

        US Democrats aren’t left and the term is still useful in European politics.

        • @9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I’m not really saying what makes them useful, that’s a long list. I was more going for saying they’re not useless, but are potentially pretty ambiguous without additional context due to how people use them.

    • @Prunebutt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Please elaborate how “equality” and “hierarchy” based policies aren’t useful labels for politics anymore.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      I’ve always liked a 2 axis spectrum. Social ownership/ private ownership on one axis. Authoritarian / libertarian on the other.

    • unalivejoy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -101 year ago

      Especially “horseshoe” politics. Leftist just means centrist.