ɔiƚoxɘup to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-21 year agoI think it could just be that simple rule...infosec.pubimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1529arrow-down11
arrow-up1528arrow-down1imageI think it could just be that simple rule...infosec.pubɔiƚoxɘup to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-21 year agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareMenKlashlinkfedilink24•1 year agoThe dilemma is how you define harming others and what implies being intolerant to an idea rather than a person holding that idea.
minus-square@MotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•edit-21 year agoHarm is a pretty solid metric. Not some imaginary “think of the children” harm, but the “this disturbs/literally harms me” kind.
minus-square@fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink1•1 year agoSorry but no, it’s not in any way solid. Some think of what they see as sinful as harmful.
The dilemma is how you define harming others and what implies being intolerant to an idea rather than a person holding that idea.
Harm is a pretty solid metric. Not some imaginary “think of the children” harm, but the “this disturbs/literally harms me” kind.
Sorry but no, it’s not in any way solid. Some think of what they see as sinful as harmful.
No, sin is wholly different than harm.