Disappointed in you, Michigan.

    • @GreenEnigma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      321 year ago

      Do I smell capitulation?

      No jurisdiction within their own state, within their own state. State Supreme Court. No jurisdiction. Within their own state.

        • @doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          They’re pointing out how obviously ridiculous the court’s claim is. There’s no room or need for an intelligent rebuttal because the Michigan Sup. Court’s opinion was not intelligently made.

          • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -171 year ago

            So I was right, the argument is that a state Supreme Court exercises unlimited authority within that state’s borders.

            What a horribly stupid take.

            • @PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Do you have a relevant discussion point or are you just here to harass people who don’t share your feelings about ex-president Trump?

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Isn’t that what state’s rights is all about?

              Do you believe that only certain things should be state’s rights?

              Who decides which is which and if it’s the feds that do that would that mean that states have no rights?

    • @_tezz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      This is correct, and everyone who is “disappointed in Michigan” should really try harder to understand the laws they’re talking about. The party primaries here are not under the authority of the state, the court was just following the rules.

      The court has however left the door open and is willing to hear this case regarding the general election ballot, which is under the state’s purview. I suspect they will rule against Trump personally but this is just rage bait for the moment.