IndescribablySad@threads.net to Greentext@sh.itjust.works • 1 year agoAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1391arrow-down128
arrow-up1363arrow-down1imageAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksIndescribablySad@threads.net to Greentext@sh.itjust.works • 1 year agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-square@JokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink40•edit-21 year agoNo because this is classical operant conditioning not Pavlovian. Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
minus-square@Rodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilink26•1 year agoPavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
minus-square@Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink15•1 year agoI think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
minus-square@JokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•1 year agoThis is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.
No because this is
classicaloperant conditioning not Pavlovian.Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
Pavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
I think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
This is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.