@ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 1 year agoFunctional bros be likelemmy.worldimagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1313arrow-down117
arrow-up1296arrow-down1imageFunctional bros be likelemmy.world@ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squareladlinkfedilink13•1 year agoI’d agree with the first half, but not the second. Sometimes mutability allows for more concise code, although in most cases it’s better to not mutate at all
minus-square@9point6@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•1 year agoI feel like I should maybe have put a “probably” in there After all “there’s no silver bullet”, but in anything but a few edge cases, the rule applies, IMO
I’d agree with the first half, but not the second. Sometimes mutability allows for more concise code, although in most cases it’s better to not mutate at all
I feel like I should maybe have put a “probably” in there
After all “there’s no silver bullet”, but in anything but a few edge cases, the rule applies, IMO