• FundMECFS
      link
      fedilink
      168 months ago

      Man the english language makes no sense.

      the sound in lose is the same sound as we are taught “oo” makes.

      Couldn’t a more straightforward language be chosen as the global one ffs

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        118 months ago

        My father (who had a PhD in English) used to tell me that “ghoti” was pronounced “fish”

        GH as in rouGH
        O as in wOmen
        TI as in raTIon

        • @Sc00ter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          How do you pronounce women? When I put those sounds together it makes more of a fush or fosh than fish .

          Or do you say fish different than me?

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            118 months ago

            “Wih-men.” I think you’re thinking of woman, the singular version of the word.

        • Dr. Bluefall
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          That isn’t really consistent with English orthography.

          But you can write “pfysche”, and that would be consistent with English.

        • @Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          68 months ago

          Looks like loose is from Germanic/Old Norse, “laus”

          And lose is from Old English, “los”

          Also looks like I can’t stand to look at either of these words for a few day now.

          • @Nutteman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            From my tiny amount of research eventually it passed through the Dutch layer and ended up as “loose” from those origin points before being adopted into english

        • FundMECFS
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          doesn’t matter what the root is. Just conform the spelling to fit your language’s rules

      • @vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        There’s also loose and they sound the same but mean different things.

        Loose is when your pants is too wide.

        Lose is when the pants were so wide that you lost them.

        • FundMECFS
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Lucy’s loose legwear lost latitude, leisurely lowering, leaving Lucy’s legs largely liberated. Lamentably, Lucy’s lost leggings landed listlessly, loitering lifelessly.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

          Man looking a thesaurus is fun Lol

          • @vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Interesting, I didn’t know that. FYI, there’s the phonetic transcription that saves us from using other words to describe a pronunciation.

            luːz - lose

            luːs - loose

        • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          I think they sound different, loose ends with a curt “s” sound, while lose ends with a longer “z” sound.

          • Jojo, Lady of the West
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Ooh, also its accent, this is not a thing couplet for me

            Discount, viscount, load and broad,
            Toward, to forward, to reward,

            Nor it’s immediate predecessor,

            Banquet is not nearly parquet,
            Which exactly rhymes with khaki.

            Parquet isn’t in my vocabulary, but doesn’t seem to rhyme with khaki in any common dialect either way.