@lysdexic@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish • 6 months agoConcurrency is not parallelismgo.devexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up197arrow-down12
arrow-up195arrow-down1external-linkConcurrency is not parallelismgo.dev@lysdexic@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-square@FizzyOrange@programming.devlinkfedilink21•6 months agoYeah it always bothered me that they’re saying “concurrency is not concurrency”. I’m going to start using “multitasking” instead. That’s so much better. Who’s with me?
minus-square@doughless@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•6 months agoI will typically use the terms asynchronous and parallel when discussing the concepts, but I hadn’t thought about using multitasking until I saw that comment. I mean, even C# calls them “tasks”.
Yeah it always bothered me that they’re saying “concurrency is not concurrency”.
I’m going to start using “multitasking” instead. That’s so much better. Who’s with me?
I will typically use the terms asynchronous and parallel when discussing the concepts, but I hadn’t thought about using multitasking until I saw that comment. I mean, even C# calls them “tasks”.