nukeM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • edit-24 months agoWe live in the dumbest timelinesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1693arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1690arrow-down1imageWe live in the dumbest timelinesh.itjust.worksnukeM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • edit-24 months agomessage-square92fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Maggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•4 months agoThat’s not what that means. You’ve been told what it means.
minus-square@gmtom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish-4•4 months agoYes, and, like my first comment t said, it’s technically not classified.
minus-squarenukeOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-24 months agoYou’re still wrong and at this point, getting fucking annoying
minus-square@gmtom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoSure, whatever, if it means that much to you.
minus-squarenukeOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-24 months agoThat’s how we enforce Rule 7. By actually knowing what classified means.
minus-square...m...linkfedilinkEnglish2•4 months ago…technically, it’s not not classified, it’s unclassified… …does unclassified require something to have first been classified?..semantically, certainly, but technically i have no idea…
That’s not what that means. You’ve been told what it means.
Yes, and, like my first comment t said, it’s technically not classified.
You’re still wrong and at this point, getting fucking annoying
Sure, whatever, if it means that much to you.
That’s how we enforce Rule 7. By actually knowing what classified means.
…technically, it’s not not classified, it’s unclassified…
…does unclassified require something to have first been classified?..semantically, certainly, but technically i have no idea…
Troll