@MicroWave@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • edit-22 years agoAutonomous AI-Generated Artwork Cannot Be Copyrighted, Judge Ruleswww.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1214arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1212arrow-down1external-linkAutonomous AI-Generated Artwork Cannot Be Copyrighted, Judge Ruleswww.rollingstone.com@MicroWave@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • edit-22 years agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Halosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilink7•2 years agoWhat if I were to create a training model made exclusively from my own artwork. It would only be reassembling my work, so would that not be copyrighteable? I wonder how that would be handled in the future.
minus-square@SheeEttin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•2 years agoBecause you’re not generating the output. I’m not sure I agree with this position, but that’s the reasoning.
minus-square@schroedingershat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoIf that were the case, a compiled program is not copyrightable.
What if I were to create a training model made exclusively from my own artwork. It would only be reassembling my work, so would that not be copyrighteable?
I wonder how that would be handled in the future.
Because you’re not generating the output.
I’m not sure I agree with this position, but that’s the reasoning.
If that were the case, a compiled program is not copyrightable.