☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 month agoTradeoffslemmy.mlimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1112arrow-down14cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1108arrow-down1imageTradeoffslemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPlinkfedilink1•1 month agoI’m thinking something more along the lines of Haskell or Idris type definitions. You can use that to specify the function signature, and that becomes the contract that the function has to fulfill.
Isn’t this COBOL or 4GL or something?
I’m thinking something more along the lines of Haskell or Idris type definitions. You can use that to specify the function signature, and that becomes the contract that the function has to fulfill.