• I think people mostly align to the system that advances their material interests. That’s why uppet middle class suburbia produces a lot more reactionaries that fantasize about doing things from the saw movies to “home invaders” (we know what race they are in the fantasies)

    • @thepeoplesinging@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      I would mostly agree. There are instances of class traitors among the bourgeoisie who have aided leftist causes. But perhaps there are other material forces at play for them too.

      • True, and that’s why those people are heroes. The fact that we even call them “class traitors” says that most people think along class lines.

    • @amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      01 month ago

      I would say it’s always some of both. Otherwise class traitors wouldn’t exist. And in the case of like white supremacy, that is going back generations in being established and normalized, and has yet to be dismantled on a system level in its strongest bases (such as the US). Colonialism goes even further back than the establishment of white supremacy, if I’m not mistaken, and that hasn’t been fully dismantled either, only in some regions.

      • @supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s precisely my point. When Columbus landed on the shores of this hemisphere, there was no propaganda against the natives. He just somehow knew to call them “savages” etc. He knew right away that’s what he needed to do to justify taking their stuff and making them slaves.

        • -6-6-6-
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          There was inherent propaganda already in place from centuries of European warfare such as the Reconquista and some argument can be had that this sort of mindset came from wanting to emulate Rome and influenced by the massive continent-spanning religious institution that birthed from it. Roughly at around the same time, Europeans were beginning to “explore” Sub-Saharan Africa. There’s plenty of previous precedent that could have created “propaganda” in the mind of the settlers.

          • @supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Ok, but then again that was also powered by material interests. I am over giving a cop out to people and saying oh poor little child was led by pied piper to be a racist freak.

            This also stems from arrogance. Oh we are so smart to see through it, if only the rest of the population was as smart as us to break from the programming. If there are class traitors that can break from propaganda, there should be more of them especially after the recent genocide.

            • -6-6-6-
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Nobody is saying that. If anything, they had the chance to see through these interests upon meeting a new culture and instead chose to exploit and destroy it. There is no “you have to give justification”. Never was. Instead, you have to recognize that people have precedent and reason for what they believe in. Even if it’s nonsensical as “I killed them because my dog told me too”. In the case I just quoted, it would tell you whoever said that is suffering mental distress rather than trying to think it’s a justification.

              The programming is also very, very strong. Many of us weren’t communists or socialists originally. The effort to actually get there can be near insurmountable for some people especially when you take a look at the state of critical thinking, education and overall higher-learning in the global hegemon. For Europe, it’s tradition and clinging onto the ideals of dead and gone empires.

              • @amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                01 month ago

                Exactly. I don’t mean it as an excuse for people who think or do horrible things, but more that when we better understand where things come from, then we can better counter them.

              • I understand the point you are making now. Apologies for arguing something that wasn’t your point to begin with.

                If anything, they had the chance to see through these interests upon meeting a new culture and instead chose to exploit and destroy it.

                This is more what I was trying to get at.