Sure, but I don’t really care what that idiot thinks. When I read an article about there being a “Signal security failure,” I expect there to be a Signal security failure.
It’s coming from Trump? Like idk what to say lol, I was already aware of the situation so it was very obvious to me.
Here’s an example, if I work at a bank and someone’s information is leaked to the public due to an issue with the security of the company, that would be a security issue on the software side.
If instead it was simply leaked manually by a person, that would STILL BE a security leak.
Sure, but I don’t really care what that idiot thinks. When I read an article about there being a “Signal security failure,” I expect there to be a Signal security failure.
The security failure was using signal, it’s not that difficult to parse the difference lmfao.
So you’re gonna pretend that’s your first interpretation of the meaning of the sentence, huh?
Edit: Also, that’s wrong interpretation of what happened either way, guess the title doesn’t work even if you’re intentionally obtuse.
It’s coming from Trump? Like idk what to say lol, I was already aware of the situation so it was very obvious to me.
Here’s an example, if I work at a bank and someone’s information is leaked to the public due to an issue with the security of the company, that would be a security issue on the software side.
If instead it was simply leaked manually by a person, that would STILL BE a security leak.
And are you going to call both a “bank security issue”?
Yes you absolutely would