Summary
The Atlantic has published unredacted attack plans (non-paywall link) shared in a Signal group chat of senior Trump officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard.
Editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg released the full texts after officials denied sharing war plans or classified information, arguing transparency was necessary amid accusations of dishonesty.
The leaked messages detailed U.S. military strikes targeting Houthis in Yemen.
For the Atlantic article https://archive.is/2025.03.26-131842/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/
“We are currently clean on OPSEC” - man leaking information on a non-official channel while cosplaying as a military leader.
My daughter’s daycare is more stringent on OPSEC for christ’s sake.
It’s like an email with a “If you’re not the intended recipient please don’t read and dispose of this message” footer levels of OPSEC.
Team Stupid
🇺🇸🌏👨🚀🔫👨🚀🌌
What does Ohio have to do with this?
Not anymore you ain’t
If they were using Signal on personal phones, an unofficial channel on unofficial devices, they already weren’t, even before they accidentally included a journalist in the chat.
Oh what the future holds
And don’t forget, one of those phones was in Moscow!
One guy on the call was actually in RUSSIA at the moment of the text. What are the odds that Russia was monitoring the phone of a visiting American governmental figure?
By all accounts, Signal’s encryption is robust, so they’d need spyware on the device to monitor the contents of the chat, or even to see who else was in the chat. Since these people were using their own personal devices and not government devices, there’s a higher chance that Russia or China or some other power could have put spyware on their device. So that is a major lapse in security, and there’s a chance it could have been spied on. But the person being physically in Russia shouldn’t make it any easier for the Russian government to spy on the chat itself.
Clearly, they never were.
The US military got so lucky here.
They’re lucky that the incompetence was exposed so early in the administration. Signal isn’t allowed on government phones, apparently, so this was all done with personal devices. We’ve already seen how many people have compromised phones with something like Pegasus installed. This is why secure government phones exist in the first place. Who knows how long some foreign spy agency might have been reading the group chat if they hadn’t done such a stupid leak.
They’re lucky that the guy accidentally included in the group chat was a responsible journalist, not some rando who’d stay in the group chat and just keep leaking this stuff, or someone who might have chosen to sell access to China or North Korea or something.
They’re lucky that the target was Houthi rebels, and not a near-peer nation state. Even with hours of advance warning, the Houthis probably wouldn’t have been able to shoot down F-18s. But 3+ hours is plenty of time for a more advanced enemy to set up an ambush.
Can you imagine how it feels to be one of the F-18 pilots reading this article, knowing how close you could have come to getting killed?
Trump has always carried a personal phone, which he has always refused to allow intelligence agencies to sweep for spyware. Every bad actor in the world knows what he says the instant he says it.
I wouldn’t be surprised of the NSA or a similar agency controls key cell “towers” near the White House and other places he often goes, Mar A Lago, etc. Even in normal times, that’s just good practice, but with Trump it might allow them to do some filtering or drop data strategically.
Yeah, except now the NSA is being run by a MAGA loyalist, so they probably haven’t figured that out yet. Besides, they’re all Russian operatives, they’re probably making it easier for the Commies to listen in.
The White House has been buggier than a tenement since the last HitlerPig administration.
Pretty well contradicts the testimony of Gabbard about no specifics
Gabbard testified that she couldnt recall if weapons systems (F-18s, Strike Drones) were mentioned, and she also testified that targets werent identified, yet the transcript reveals thatbthe target was a specific person, not a group or encampment.
She either lied/ covered up, or is so incompetent she didn’t understand what a weapons system is or what constitutes a target. Or both.
My money is on both.
The texts really highlight how much more dangerous Vance would be
He’s Yale educated and put with his wife to become a “power couple” by the freaking “Tiger Mom” who’s a Yale professor who gets lots of up and coming conservatives clerkships up to even the SC. Including Usha Vance with multiple now SC justices.
He’s not some hillbilly bumpkin, he’s incredibly dangerous, like the HW Bush to Reagan.
That’s why I hate people always focusing on trump. trump is the distraction just like Reagan, both god awful humans aware of what they’re doing, but not the ones really calling the shots, and the most replaceable of all the pieces.
Would people do what Vance told them to do though?
He’s a couch fucker, but he’s undeniably got more charisma than HW, and HW still beat Dukakis…
History rhymes bro
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1988_United_States_presidential_election
Which is easy when the last names never change I guess.
My point being, the Vance’s are going to potentially be around another 30-40 years.
It took Biden 40 years to be VP, and a decade more to be president.
It does remain to be seen if Trump’s cult of personality will carry on after him. Will be interesting to see how all these sycophants will shake out when it happens. I’m not sure Vance will come out on top.
Exactly like with HW…
Or if you want to get away from Republicans: the Vances and the Clintons share an insane amount of pararells.
JD is no Bill as far as charisma, but they have similar backgrounds and married insanely smart women with very conservative economic beliefs very quickly after meeting them at Yale Law School then immediately getting into politics using their wives political connections as much as their own.
Like I said, history rhymes.
People need to stop being so shortsighted, or the wealthy are gonna keep winning off the same proven playbook.
They’re all set to “third way” the Republican party and provide an alternative to trumpism when it fails and have the billionaire money behind them to try and fight a progressive in 28.
Do people honestly not see it coming?
I mean, Berlusconi’s populism morphed into Salvini’s own spin, but such a development doesn’t translate well into American politics
So if Vance takes over, will you then have a ottoman empire?
A one-term president who may have been much smarter than his predecessor but lacked the charisma and wasn’t able to get much done as a result.
JD Vance is much smarter, but there’s only one god emperor in this cult. If Trump died, the GOP would suddenly lack a focal point and would go back to infighting and chaos.
You have zero idea about either of them…
But are very proud of your opinion it seems