When Donald Trump took the oath of office once again, it was the last time he’d be able to do so under the country’s constitution. But that hasn’t stopped his team from flirting with the idea of running again, writes Alex Hannaford – and the Democrats are nowhere to be seen...
Both sides, am I right?
Not both sides. One side and their controlled opposition.
It’s an article about Trump being a turd. Do we have to get mad about something a Democrat might do, but hasn’t done?
No, but don’t try to paint people’s legitimate frustration with the party as both sides rhetoric.
You’re right, out of either party it’s definitely the Democrats that should be known for not doing anything.
Clever rhetoric, but that was a reference to the comment assuming Schumer would say something he almost certainly won’t say.
He said something very close to it just recently in regards to shutting down criticism of any kind towards Israel, so I don’t think it’s unfair to say it’s something he thinks, even if he’s probably too smart to use those exact words.
EDIT: To be clear, I’m not talking about the being president three times, I’m specifically talking about the denying American people a choice, although in this thread the two are intertwined.
“Maybe someday they’ll let a Democrat be president for three terms!”
Obviously there is a constitutional amendment now, but you know that has happened, right?