A notable mention is https://ubports.com/en/ which is different from postmarketos in a sense that ubports uses old kernels with heavy patches. That means: good support for things, but difficult future.

PostmarketOS uses the newest kernels and tries to integrate their patches into mainline kernel, so that the reliability is maintained with all kernel developers.

  • Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -139 days ago

    I mean probably never? You’d have to design hardware specifically that’s compatible with Linux, which would cost a fortune, in the hopes of selling a whole bunch of them, and they can’t even get large numbers of people to use Linux for free.

    • @Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      189 days ago

      You’d have to design hardware specifically that’s compatible with Linux

      What makes you think that?

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -159 days ago

        I don’t know how to answer that. Because most hardware is not compatible.

        • @FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          199 days ago

          It isn’t fundamentally incompatible, there is just a lack of drivers.

          You don’t need new hardware, you need driver support.

          • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 days ago

            I think they meant you’d have to design a combination of hardware that’s all compatible with Linux - that is, that has Linux driver support.

          • Ulrich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -159 days ago

            I’m not really so concerned with how it’s incompatible…

        • @Feyd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          The only thing that is lacking for compatibility is drivers. If that’s what you meant you should have said so instead of saying hardware needs to be designed. If that’s not what you meant then you don’t know what you’re talking about.

          • Ulrich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -179 days ago

            If the hardware doesn’t have drivers then it’s incompatible 🤷

              • Ulrich
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -17
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Explain how I’m wrong or go away. Your unwarranted personal insults are not welcome.

                • @Feyd@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  129 days ago

                  EZ. Your original totally incorrect comment that you’re trying to pretend didn’t mean what it obviously meant.

                  You’d have to design hardware specifically that’s compatible with Linux

                  You don’t have to design hardware you have to write drivers.

                  It’s OK to admit you’re wrong.

                  • Ulrich
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -159 days ago

                    I’m not pretending anything. And I’m not gonna continue engaging with you with this completely unnecessary tone. You don’t know what you’re talking about. Goodbye.