The fediverse is small, and thats both a blessing and a curse - one of its several blessings is that in a smaller space we all individually have a bigger impact on what the culture of this space is like.

On this comm (and on lemmy broadly) there’s a lot of discussion about how to grow the fediverse, what to improve, but an easy thing you can do for the fediverse is right in front of us-

  • Be kind

  • Ask people what they think, and why

  • Approach folks you disagree with with curiosity rather than hostility (EDIT: no, this is not specifically referring to Nazis. I get it, they’re the first thing that comes to mind. I’m not telling you to approve of Nazis I’m just saying be kind to your fellow lemmites)

  • Engage sincerely

  • Ask yourself if there’s something nice you can say

  • Make this small space worth being in

A platform lives or dies by what’s available on said platform and often we have this conversation in the context of “content” or posts - and we may never have as much content as reddit does. But content and posts aren’t the only thing this kind of platform offers- it also offers people. It offers community, and human interaction.

Culture and community is lemmy and the fediverse’s biggest differentiator, and we all have a role to play in shaping the culture of this space.

The biggest thing you can do to help the fediverse is make it a place worth being.

  • SuiXi3D
    link
    fedilink
    361 day ago

    The second best thing is remember that tolerance of intolerance breeds intolerance.

    • @shaggyb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 hours ago

      Call them out so that resistance is visible, then block them to remove their agency to engage you.

    • @gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      i think if someone’s intolerant, pointing out that they’re wrong is something appropriate, but picking a fight over it is not worth it. it makes you like that person in that meme:


      edit: in bad cases, report it and move on with your life.

    • CrisOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is a whole different train of thought (mine is, I won’t speak for yours) and I don’t wanna derail my original thought but that’s a thing I’ve been thinking about a lot lately.

      I agree with you, and subscribe to the idea of tolerance as a social contract that, once broken, is no longer owed to the one who broke the contract.

      At the same time, I’ve also learned that very explicitly, feeling persecuted is a requisite ingredient in radicalizing people into hate groups. And that at an individual scale, it’s generally undeserved compassion that helps deradicalize them. We know this from the accounts of people who managed to leave hate groups- a little while ago there was really good (and long) interview with someone who used to be leader of a white nationalist group where he talked a fair bit about that idea, since he now works with a nonprofit that helps families and friends support and deradicalize loved ones, but it’s far from the only account

      At present I’m really not sure how I personally reconcile those two things I belive to be true. The Nazi bar analogy is real.

      I know wading into this more specific conversion runs the risk of immediately derailing what I was trying to start a discussion about, but I figured I’d share my thoughts. If anyone reads this and has thoughts to share (though I’d prefer not to get 50 comments just saying I suck for having complicated views on what we do about the predicament the US and world is in with the rise of fascist ideology. I’m interested in what’s effective in terms of fixing the problem just like you are) I’d be interested in hearing them. I’m still looking for a way to synthesize my beliefs into a coherent whole.

      Edit: thought I’d add the interview for anyone curious. I don’t see everything exactly the way he does but I think understanding the problem and exactly how it works is necessary of we’re going to address it, and I think his account is a really useful glimpse into certain aspects of how that world works

      • @pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I agree with everything you said at the top and this comment as well. You don’t have to be mean, cruel, or shitty to the bad actors. In fact the best case scenario is to make your case once and then walk away. It’s much easier to talk about than to actually do, but it’s really effective. If you assume they’re not trolls or bad actors, even better. All of these actions curtail flame wars, which is what they’re after anyway if you’re correct that they’re a bad actor or troll.

        • CrisOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 day ago

          Thanks for your thoughts, thats a bit different of an approach than I’d really thought about, I feel like my thoughts have kinda been stuck at both extremes

          That gives me new things to think about, thank you ❤️

      • @dota__2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 day ago

        they’re going to “feel” persecuted, no matter what. might as well make them actually fucking fear it.

    • @misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 day ago

      I think part of pleasantness is not bringing politics into things that weren’t intended to be about politics.

      • Banana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        271 day ago

        The problem is politics impacts everything and the word “political” means different things to different people.

        To some, talking about being gay is political, even though to people who are in that community, it’s literally just talking about their lives.

        • @misk@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -81 day ago

          It did not impact this thread at all before this comment which was my point exactly.

          • Banana
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1422 hours ago

            I definitely saw several comments that strike me as political, which is exactly my point, everyone has a different definition.

            When every aspect of your life is affected by politics, everything is political.

      • Yardy Sardley
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 day ago

        To interject with a somewhat pedantic point, nothing is truly apolitical. But there is something to be said about sensing the proper time and place to start a political argument.

    • Mike Wooskey
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -111 day ago

      That suggests we should be intolerant of intolerance, which is an oxymoron.

      • @dota__2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 day ago

        it’s only an oxymoron if you’re a moron. tolerance is a social contract. the intolerant break that contract and are no longer to be protected by it.

      • SuiXi3D
        link
        fedilink
        191 day ago

        Almost as if the statement is referring to the paradox of tolerance.

        By allowing people like Nazis, Christofascists, Tankies, etc. a platform, it only invites more sharing that view to spread their bullshit around. This makes those that don’t share those extremist views uncomfortable they then leave those places. You see it on platforms like Truth Social, X, and 4Chan.

        If this is to be a kind place, we must encourage kindness and rid ourselves of unkindness. You can’t tolerate intolerance, lest it spread and take over.

        • Banana
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If you allow wolves and sheep into a space, that is a wolves-only space.

          (For context, I agree with you.)

        • Ogmios
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 day ago

          If you actually had a coherent definition of what a Nazi is, it might be possible to agree with you. But in reality, it’s used as a catch all by shitty people to justify their shitty behaviour.

          • @fubo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            To be clear, I mean people who praise Hitler, get swastika tattoos, blame everything on a Jewish Conspiracy, etc.

            You know, Nazis.

            • @JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              09 hours ago

              That’s coherent. Unfortunately most people who use it today literally mean “someone who disagrees with me.” It really muddies the water because it’s often accompanied by threats of violence. The net effect is raising the temperature in the room on both sides, because it’s effectively dehumanising others who have perfectly valid political disagreements, and calling for their death.

          • @monarch@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            423 hours ago

            No its not. Just because you can’t understand that shipping people to labour camps makes you a nazi or supporting someone who does also makes you a nazi doesn’t mean other people have that issue.

            • Ogmios
              link
              fedilink
              English
              021 hours ago

              That’s what you say today because you think it’s convenient to your argument, but it actually shows exactly what I’m talking about because the definition you’ve offered would make no sense at all to anyone a year ago, but people like you were still calling everyone Nazis then.

              • @monarch@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                019 hours ago

                I’m sorry big daddy Trump cucked you but everyone with the ability to read Project 2025 could tell you this was going to happen.

      • @rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 day ago

        Paradox of Tolerance - Karl Poppler - 1945

        It’s a shame that something we already figured out 60 years ago still needs to be learned by most people.

        The good news is, this is an opportunity for you to grow and be better right now. It’s never too late to improve yourself.

          • @rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            224 hours ago

            Wdym financial cashes, pandemic, doomscrolling, Trump got the presidency twice??

            You’re talking crazy it’s only 2005 bro, futuristic computer interface means frutiger aero, I listen to music on my iPod and text on my candybar flip phone </3</3

            • Coelacanth
              link
              fedilink
              English
              523 hours ago

              Don’t worry, at least 2005 was only ten years ago.

              …wait.

      • Banana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 day ago

        Sure, if you think of it as purely semantic, or a zero sum game with no nuance, but it’s not.

        Gotta be intolerant of those being needlessly cruel to those just trying to live their lives, and gotta be tolerant of those just trying to live their lives that don’t affect you, even if you find it cringey.