They need the max sentence, every time. None of them are sorry; they’re just telling the judge what they think he wants to hear. They might as well not be sorry making license plates for a decade.
: an unexpected usually disconcerting challenge, revelation, or catch
also : an attempt to embarrass, expose, or disgrace someone (such as a politician) with a gotcha
You’re right, please forgive me. Let’s put the spot light back on you.
What’s this charade the judges are playing by sentencing these people for decades again? Obviously ten or more years is a short time. What’s the grift?
I think the point is that people perceived your first post as a statement coming from a right wing conspiracy nut. With this post it’s clear that you mean that there is a political bias in favour of the defendant.
many times the US simply assassinates people on the left before the can become defendants
That’s a bold claim. People such as…?
this is starting to feel like I’m being sea-lioned.
A bullshit term made up so people can pretend to be victims when other people ask them questions. It’s not “sea-lioning” when you come out of your little bubble for a few minutes and nobody has any idea what the fuck you’re talking about.
They need the max sentence, every time. None of them are sorry; they’re just telling the judge what they think he wants to hear. They might as well not be sorry making license plates for a decade.
they’re sorry they failed. Sorry they got caught, and sorry they’re being held accountable.
what they’re not sorry about is trying to fucking overthrow the lawful government of this country. So yeah.
I still want judges to have discretion to decide appropriate punishment. 3 strikes laws are a good example of mandatory sentencing gone wrong.
Nobody’s talking about mandatory minimum sentencing. I do agree with you BTW.
“I’ve learned my lesson, judge.”
“It’s a trick. Get an axe.”
The judge can call a hearing based on his actions, and re-sentence him. It’s already happened to at least one of these chucklefucks
Do you have a source for this? Not that I don’t trust you, I just want to laugh at these chucklefucks.
deleted by creator
Sending people to jail for decades: the new charade.
-by your local tinfoil hat
deleted by creator
Oh what a gotcha. 18 years isn’t two decades. Good job 👏
That sounds like a foreign language.
Is common English foreign to you?
gotcha noun
: an unexpected usually disconcerting challenge, revelation, or catch also : an attempt to embarrass, expose, or disgrace someone (such as a politician) with a gotcha
Used in a sentence:
deleted by creator
Totally forgot ten years isn’t a decade.
Man, you really got me by the balls.
deleted by creator
You’re right, please forgive me. Let’s put the spot light back on you.
What’s this charade the judges are playing by sentencing these people for decades again? Obviously ten or more years is a short time. What’s the grift?
22 years. 2.2 decades. Multiple. Decades. Plural.
https://www.npr.org/2023/09/05/1197202616/enrique-tarrio-proud-boys-jan-6-sentence
Oh boy.
What charade is that?
deleted by creator
ROFL! I would LOVE an explanation of this.
deleted by creator
That’s not an example of double standards. I’m wanting that part explained.
deleted by creator
I think the point is that people perceived your first post as a statement coming from a right wing conspiracy nut. With this post it’s clear that you mean that there is a political bias in favour of the defendant.
Got any examples?
No idea what sea lions have to do with anything, but…. If you say so.
That’s a bold claim. People such as…?
A bullshit term made up so people can pretend to be victims when other people ask them questions. It’s not “sea-lioning” when you come out of your little bubble for a few minutes and nobody has any idea what the fuck you’re talking about.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator