X appears to be juicing MrBeast’s views to woo the YouTuber to the platform, pushing video upload into users’ feeds as an unlabeled ad::undefined

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What’s more I’ve never once seen a Mr beast video.

        And nothing of value was lost.

        Mr. Beast only offers “charity porn” that makes him richer. He’s not doing anything to change the systems in place that make the problems he “solves” any better. He’s just putting band-aids on small groups of people while doing nothing to address larger issues. Hell, he himself is an example of a larger issue. We should not have to rely on the rich to fix societies problems, that’s what fucking taxes are for, and Mr. Beast needs to be taxed until his fucking channel is gone.

        I fully await for him to completely deep throat Elon to make more money. Mr. Beast doesn’t care about pesky things like real morals or values, or he wouldn’t be online friends with the likes of Musk to begin with. All he cares about is the dollar signs.

        EDIT: I’m definitely expecting the day when some journalist does a “big reveal” on all the shady horrible shit that goes on with Mr. Beast and his companies.

        EDIT II: You know Mr. Beast doesn’t give a flying fuck about anything but money because he’s still friends with Musk after the very public reveal of one of his staff being trans. The fact that he can be friends with such a fucking bigot while “supporting” their trans staff member reveals how little he actually gives a fuck about the issue. He’s happy to be friends with people who would deny Kris the life she wishes to lead, so how much does he really care?

        • @otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          that’s what fucking taxes are for, and Mr. Beast needs to be taxed until his fucking channel is gone.

          Why until his channel is gone? If he’s a business, we need to tax him and his business appropriately. More, sure. But taxing a business until it’s gone is counterproductive, even if you don’t like what the business stands for…

          • Snot Flickerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            His “business” is a charity. Charity shouldn’t have to exist in a world with enough wealth to support everyone.

            If his channel became something else, sure. But the point is he would be taxed until all those problems he “fixes” are solved, and then he wouldn’t have much to put on his channel, would he?

            If you take away the “charity” what the fuck does Mr. Beast even bring to the table?

      • @Nima@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I’ve had a much more enjoyable time on freetube because of this, actually. unlike youtube who feeds you content based on what makes them the most money, it tends to actually show you videos that are relevant to what you’re watching. whether it has millions of views or 100.

        it feels like the smaller communities are a little more warm and fun.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fuck, remember webcomics?

      Achewood, Diesel Sweeties, Cat and Girl, Penny Arcade, Cyanide & Happiness, Joe and Monkey, Questionable Content, Dresden Codak (always updated way too infrequently), Dinosaur Comics, Gone With the Blastwave, Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal, The Perry Bible Fellowship, When I Grow Up/WIGU/Overcompensating, Married to the Sea, hell, even CTRL+ALT+DEL left us with Loss. I could go on, there’s definitely more.

      …but I don’t like to talk about what happened with SinFest.

      A lot of these sites had advertising, but I don’t remember any of it being so off-putting that I felt the need for an adblocker. Honestly, at this point, I don’t even recall if adblockers were a thing yet in 2000-2005.

      So much content in those early aughts. I’m still waiting on a Complete Achewood. Damn you, Chris Onstad!

      I was always a little disappointed I never was able to get a “I’m the guy who sucks/plus I got depres-sion” shirts.

      • @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I’m happy to see that Something Positive is still going strong. Dude is a great person and it’s fun to see his parenting come out through the comic as I catch up and now relate to some of that more than I did before.

      • @Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Freefall is still going strong, 3 panels a week. Since like 1998 or something. Never loses the humor either, unlike some comics that ditch humor once they develop dramatic plot.

      • PlasmaDistortion
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I actually bought things from their ads because I wanted to support them. Those days are long gone.

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          They mostly advertised other comics and merchandise from other comics, if I recall correctly.

          Also, Adblock originally released in 2002, and Adblock Plus came out in 2006.

          I do recall one of the reasons I respected webcomics ads was they weren’t ones that were animated, blaring music, or asking me to try to play a mini-game by clicking on something that specifically can’t be caught by your mouse.

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What early 2000’s webcomics taught me is there were a lot of really great writers out there with some subpar art skills.

          When the writing is so good, you don’t give a shit that it’s all stick figures.

          EDIT: I almost forgot. With some of them, the best part was watching them go from stick figures to genuinely great art. Penny Arcade is a great example. The originals were so badly drawn, and it went from bad art to an artist literally having a style all their own.

          • @Patch@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Some of them were actually pretty good artists; occasionally you’d see them do other stuff and it’d be genuinely good on an artistic level.

            The whole stick man, lumpy face, primitivist thing was just an “in” aesthetic (while also being conveniently really quick to produce).

            • @root_beer@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              There are a few webcomics out there that have some excellent artwork. Lackadaisy is the first to come to mind, though updates have always been verrrry sporadic—especially now that she’s working on an animated version—and there was one called The Abominable Charles Christopher that was fucking phenomenal, but it just sorta… stopped. I’m still subscribed to the RSS because I’m holding out hope, but I know it’s over.

              • Snot Flickerman
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Oh Jeeze thanks for the reminder of Abominable Charles Christopher. I was always so disappointed when it just sort of stopped. I always assumed he got a professional gig through the work he was doing.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Yes. In fact, it got me a lot of attention. I got into a bunch of newspapers, interviewed on NPR, etc. Then my audience started drifting away and on to the next thing… and then YouTube decided to monetize. My account was monetized for a while. I made a grand total of $100 before it was demonetized again.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          My big hit was “The Skeletor Show.” It’s still on YouTube. But I did many other things on the account before deciding I didn’t feel like making comedy videos anymore a few years ago. Occasionally people post asking me to please come back, but I don’t know that I ever will.

          I will say that it did get me some jobs when I needed work, which was the original goal of the show anyway.

  • @ombremad@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 year ago

    Imagine running scam on video views like, 5 years after Facebook’s infamously bs « pivot to video » bombed. What a visionary man.

    • Stern
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      I’ve seen his memes, five years behind everyone else is p much his M.O.

  • @Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 year ago

    Why is it people who hoard wealth and use that wealth to hoard more wealth by fucking as many people as possible always get this dismissive “eh of course they do shrug,” - but as soon as somebody finds wealth and is like “how can I do something useful with this” then uses that wealth to start a food bank and fund water/energy projects for needy communities we gotta spend our day breaking down how they’re evil and sus?

    • @Phegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Because people who get this rich do it by exploiting the poor. They aren’t going to turn around and be nice. People who get this rich start as absolute shit bags. They remain the same after.

      • @WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        … that doesn’t answer the question they asked.

        Did you literally not even manage to read a whole one paragraph comment before responding?

      • @Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My brother in Christ he’s a fucking YouTuber. If you don’t want to be in a video, say no. 🤷

        Of course for all this screeching about exploitation I’d happily put down $50 that says you wouldn’t turn down a free car because you “don’t want to be exploited.”

        Go tell the people in the 21 counties of NC his food pantry travels to that they’re being exploited and see what they think of your hot take. Or are you one of those “feeding people robs them of their bootstraps” types?

        • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          You can feed people and do good things while exploiting them to further your notoriety and wealth. These are not mutually exclusive. It is perfect acceptable to be turned off or even disgusted by someone shoving a camera into every situation to extract some kind of profit from it along with self-aggrandizement, even if some of those profits are returned to the community that helped generate those profits as a “good deed”.

          • @Cowlitz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Don’t let ideals get in the way of good. While what you say is true, he could literally help no one if he hadn’t followed this business model. He wouldn’t have the cash. His videos bring in more cash which can help more people. Yes he makes money too but its more distasteful to me to be someone like you who prefers less people get help if someone else profits from it than it is to be someone like him who helps more people than you are and also makes money from it.

            A bit rich for you to be saying his way is wrong when you probably haven’t ponyed up your own cash to help even a fraction of the people. The world you want to exist does not. Everything has a cost. Id rather people do some good in exchange for that cost than wish everyone did everything for free which incentivizes no one to do anything.

            I don’t watch him. His videos don’t really appeal for me but I recognize the good that can be done in such a format.

            • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              That’s a fat lie for you to say that I prefer people not be helped.

              Where’s your cash dump to the poor?

              You read what you wanted and made the rest up. It is also possible be disgusted with someone’s approach and still understand it helps people.

          • @Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            rounds back to original point of how somebody who does literally anything with their wealth gets this huge tirade about how they’re evil but the richer YouTubers and actual billionaires face no real critique.

            It really is weird how a millionaire who runs a food bank and funds various infrastructure projects is more villainous to people than billionaires who play every corporate greed trick in the book, and I’m tired of people acting like it’s not.

            • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re not wrong. But that doesn’t mean we have to accept relentless self-promotion either. You also forget he’s still gonna be rich, barring financial disaster. Gonna point your finger at him when he’s done with YouTube, sitting in a 10k sq ft mansion with a garage full of exotics? If we want to point fingers I’d be willing to be lt a bunch of those “actual billionaires” engage in a lot of philanthropy without sticking their identity in front of a camera telling you about it at every turn?

              This stuff smacks of evangelical prosperity gospel. Just give me money so I can do the lord’s work and drive to the church in my Lambo, except there’s nobody controlling a gateway to Heaven, just a mention and a shout out to top donors in a video.

              • @Facebones@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -5
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You didn’t answer my question.

                Why do billionaires who do a fraction of a fraction of what he does get a free pass to actively steal economic activity from their workers and customers because their product isn’t content - but somebody whose business is creating something of value (content) who pays his people reasonably and also does good for people needs to be be taken down at every turn and shat on at every opportunity?

                Corporate apologism at its finest, right here. The only true evil is making money via creating a popular product instead of stealing the economic value of those who create a product for you because you already had all the capital to start with. Infinite corporate greed is good because it’s private, using your money and platform to help people is evil because they do it in the open.

                GTFO

                • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Nobody is giving them a free pass. You’re the only one suggesting that. We’re discussing the weather and you keep jumping in and yelling the sky is blue. No shit, sherlock, but we’re discussing the weather. Don’t you get it? You’re the only person saying that. We’re talking about Mr Beast, and all you keep saying is What about all those other people? I don’t give a shit about them because we’re talking about Mr Beast. You’re the guy that keeps jumping into the conversation and trying to change the subject to make it about something else. You’re nuts or completely live under a rock if you think lemmy/reddit/fediverse doesn’t shit on billionaires regularly, doesn’t discuss wealth inequality, doesn’t point out ostentatious displays of wealth. Do other billionaires get a pass? NO. Now let us continue our discussion without having to be reminded about something we already know.

    • Kayn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      “Bad” rich people are dismissed because Lemmy users expect this behavior of them. What they don’t expect or believe in is someone genuinely using their wealth for good.

      “If God is all powerful, he cannot be all good. And if he is all good, then he cannot be all powerful”

    • @nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I don’t really know either but my son definitely knows.

      Somehow Mr. Beast vacuums kid’s brains into a mind sucking vortex that has landed Mr. Beast as one of, if not the #1 most subscribed YouTuber in existence.

      Perhaps that also makes him the highest earning YouTuber as well, because the guy is seemingly just giving away insane $ figures at every turn yet always has more.

      • @crackajack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Mr Beast uses the revenue he got from YouTube views and donates them. Which he then videos and create more revenue. Not a bad business model if you ask me. He wasn’t even rich to begin with. His assets and wealth all started from YouTube.

        • I Cast Fist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          For companies, it’s free PR. “Mr Beast donates thousands of turkeys for thanksgiving!” - all of the them brought to you by [company], because they really care about you, for realsies!

          And, according to some videos, most of his challenges are setup for a specific person to win.

        • @nucleative@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Yeah that seems like a smart business model. Something about his style makes this work… I don’t think most people could pull it off.

    • @bonus_crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      The largest individual youtuber in the world. He has several channels, the main ones are Mr.Beast and Mr.Beast philanthropy.

      I think the main selling point of youtube is watching people do things you cannot, either due to time, expertise, or money. Mr.Beast kinda personifies that, as many of his videos cost over $1M to make and are original owing to nobody else being able to make them, ala ‘I made a lazer dungeon, first person to reach the end wins $500k’ .

      • @victoitor@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I’ve seen some of those videos since my son likes him. The issue is that a lot of his content is obviously scripted. If the content itself is scripted (faked), why should I believe that money is actually given out in the end and, again, not just part of the script?

      • @PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        He also was one of the first to master the YouTube algorithm and perfected the video format to engage viewers the most.

        • Maven (famous)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          I agree but in a way where I absolutely hate that he did this. Mr Beast is one of the worst things to happen to YouTube.

          • @UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Double edge sword. We now know better than before about how the algorithm works thanks to him. Unfortunately, that also means that others are now equipped with similar spam knowledge.

      • @Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Philanthropic”

        Is it really philanthropy if you make fucking BANK doing it? I don’t think philanthropy goes hand in hand with self enrichment and the glorification of consumerism

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    If MrBeast leaves YouTube I will consider that a win. I am so tired of see his gaping jaw open on my front page for his stupid stunts and his stupid candybars.

    HE’LL BE BACK, THEY ALWAYS COME BACK

    • XIIIesq
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      You know you can set channels to “not interested” and “don’t recommend channel”, right?

      • @victoitor@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        It’s not permanent, even if you click on “don’t recommend channel”. After a while, YouTube will ignore your choice and show it to you again if it feels like it.

        • XIIIesq
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          We’re clearly doing something different because I never get Mr Beats recommend.

          • @victoitor@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s based on your viewing history.

            You can run a little experiment to verify this if you want. Take some subject you usually watch and take some channel your have interest in (and you will keep watching similar videos). Set that channel as “don’t recommend channel”. After a while (never calculated how long), you’ll get recommendations of that channel again.

            I also don’t get Mr Beast recommendation as I don’t watch similar content, but there are channels I need to keep blocking since I like the subject but not those channels in particular.

            I was mostly just saying that the “don’t recommend channel” approach is not a solution for everyone.

      • Kichae
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Self-promotion is not charity. And neither is putty porn. It’s just the cost of doing business when you’re your own brand. And philanthropy is a scam promoted by the rich to help justify their wealth hoarding.

        All of it ultimately ends up personally furthering the rich person’s personal goals. It’s all just a way of saying that the rich deserve to determine what society goals should be, and how society should use its limited resources.

        It’s taking control away from the masses, and keeping it in the hands of those with money.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Beautiful. More people need to do this with more shitty companies than just Tesla.

  • @stringere@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    Tweet may have been deleted.

    And this is why articles should be using screenshots and not links to tweets.

  • @Laticauda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Isn’t one of Mr. Beast’s friends or employees trans? He’s shown open support for them too. He has a vested interest in not associating with Elon.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He’s got vested interest in gargling Musk’s balls.

      “I’m about to finish this book and I want you to know that I respect the hell out of you,” he wrote on February 11, 2020. “Ever since I started learning about your work ethic and passion I’ve been more motivated than ever to make a difference. I look up to you.”

      To note, 2020 was a couple years after Musk called the cave diver that saved kids a pedo.

      That was the moment that all rational people figured out he was a complete asshat. Mr. Beast didn’t.

      In my view, it means Mr. Beast doesn’t actually respect Kris very much, to keep being this buddy-buddy with Musk.

      • @Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean Musk wasn’t as loud about his bigotry at that point, not in the way he is now at least, and Mr Beast has been openly supportive of trans people. Being a bit of an idiot and being a raging bigot aren’t the same thing, and that incident mostly convinced people that Elon was an idiot. It’s entirely possible he’s changed his mind about Musk in 3 years. I’m not a Mr Beast fan by any means, I don’t watch his content or anything and tbh I found his reaction to the Jacksepticeye thing to be annoying which hasn’t endeared him to me, so I don’t have any skin in the game on his end of things, but there were a lot of people who didn’t hate Elon after the cave diving thing who do hate him now so I wouldn’t really treat that post as gospel personally. A lot of people don’t want to admit it but Elon used to have way better PR than he does now, and a lot of people have changed their minds about him over time. So atm I don’t see any reason to believe that Mr. Beast would revoke his support for trans people for Musk. His support of trans people is more recent as well. Maybe I’m wrong but I’d rather be optimistic about it until he gives me reason not to be.

      • @GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t know much about him but from what I know he seems like the kind of guy who would put money above all. I’m guessing as long as he thinks he can benefit from Musk it doesn’t matter if his friend or employee is trans.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Smart enough to show support for his trans staff member while also being friends with someone who would deny every trans person their human rights?

      He’s a fucking piece of shit speaking out of both sides of his mouth.

      You can’t support Kris and be friends with the likes of Elon Musk.

      He’s not smarter than this, he’s fucking greedy just like Musk.

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t say it in the article, but Mr. Beast’s friendship with Musk is well documented.

          https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-and-mrbeasts-complicated-friendship-timeline-2024-1


          Over the following months and years, Donaldson and Musk exchanged messages on X (Twitter back then). Donaldson said several times that he admired Musk.

          In one tweet, he said he had been reading “Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future” by Ashlee Vance.

          “I’m about to finish this book and I want you to know that I respect the hell out of you,” he wrote on February 11, 2020. “Ever since I started learning about your work ethic and passion I’ve been more motivated than ever to make a difference. I look up to you.”

          Donaldson also tweeted messages of support about Musk’s developments at Tesla, and said he would be tuning in when Musk hosted “Saturday Night Live” on May 8, 2021.

          On February 27, 2022, Musk tweeted asking why the “traditional” media was “such a relentless hatestream.”

          “Bro I could literally feed a million people and they wouldn’t care in the slightest,” Donaldson replied. “But the second I slip up and do something wrong they’ll pounce all over it lmao.”


          Musk then cryptically tweeted out: “If I die under mysterious circumstances, it’s been nice knowin ya.”

          Donaldson replied: “If that happens can I have Twitter.”

          Musk responded with a simple, “Ok.”

          “Jokes aside, be safe!” Donaldson said. “I wuv u.”


          Yeah Mr. Beast doesn’t actually respect Kris, if this is how he talks to Musk. You don’t call him “bro” and not mean it.

  • @crackajack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I wonder how well connected and rich Elon is to insulate him from consequences. Many people who have done as idiotic mistakes as he did have gone bankrupt or have been shunned already.

    • @nbafantest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      He’s not insulated. He has likely lost control of Tesla because he had to sell so many shares to buy Twitter. He’s trying to get more shares in Tesla but they’re probably not going to give him it.

    • @ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Look, I hate youtubers more than anybody I know, but if someone was impersonating this guy to prank some kid he’s never met I don’t see how we can expect him to apologize for something he didn’t know about and wasn’t involved in.

    • @31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Meh, I’ve never watched a video of his, but seems like it’s just a modern day game show/home makeover/dystopian feel-good story sort of thing. Neither good or bad. It’s good that he helps some people, bad that the people and many, many more need help.

      • @Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I agree that it sucks that we need people to help pick up the slack in our social nets and whatnot, but I think it’s unfair that people attack Mr beast for using that YouTube money to help people to make more YouTube money to help more people. Loads of these youtubers rake in more and do jack with it but never face any individual flak, but he does something different and he becomes the poster boy of evil youtuber to people.

        FWIW Beast Philanthropy is a registered 501c3, feeds like over half of NC, and has done alot of disaster relief work in a bunch of states and a handful of countries. I don’t think it’s evil that they shoot some footage in the process and a quick ad read to feed 100% of the revenue from the philanthropy channel back into the 501c3.

    • @TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      You’ve never heard a positive word about Mr. Beast / Jimmy? I have, quite a lot actually. Maybe you don’t watch the people who interact with him more, idk. He seems like a nice guy who uses his videos to generate revenue that he immediately puts back into making more videos. Like, almost all of it if I understand correctly. All while helping tons of people in the process.

      Also, Musk is desperate for Jimmy’s attention lol. He asked Mr. Beast in a tweet recently why he doesn’t upload his videos on X and basically got the answer “It’s not worth it” lol

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And now Elon Musk wants him on X. Keep in mind that Elon Musk is openly repelled by those he cannot manipulate, including anyone with working conscience who is disgusted by the kind of propagandistic hatred X serves up on the regular, and Musk tirades against that kind of ethical “wokeness” regularly. Yet he loves Mr. Beast enough to run Beast content (for free? as an ad?) to get Mr. Beast onto his platform. That’s not the kind of recommendation decent people get from Musk.

      Excellent write-up. This paragraph especially speaks volumes. Honestly, it’s an angle I hadn’t even considered, but when faced with it, yeah, exactly! How the hell does Mr. Beast not get the same “wokeness” critique as other people when it comes to Musk??

      • @TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Musk is just a suck-up. Also, Mr. Beast doesn’t really do anything he could clown on, and he’s well connected. It would make Musk’s reputation worse than it already is.