No idea what to make of this. Feels really random, but I guess we knew that Darkest Dungeon 2 didn’t do as well as they wanted it to.

  • @ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    177 months ago

    Maybe it didn’t do as well as they’d hoped, but back of the napkin guesstimates sure make it hard to believe DD2 wasn’t profitable.

    • mosiacmango
      link
      fedilink
      English
      147 months ago

      I read it more like they did well, but after a decade making the same game in a couple of iterations, they just want to be done. So sell the company, make 10x what you could running it, and just head on out.

    • @Jaderick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      I played it in alpha (?) when it first came out and it was alright. I played it for like 3 hours, but never felt a desire to revisit it.

      • warm
        link
        fedilink
        147 months ago

        Darkest Dungeon was just one of them titles that isn’t that suited for a sequel.

        • @Whitebrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          I agree with the sentiment and it’s weird that it can be applied to quite a few recent games, frostpunk 2 comes to mind as the latest one of these

          • warm
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            It’s an attempt at piggybacking off the success of the first game, but they don’t take the time to understand why it was successful and if a sequel is needed. I’d love to see devs try something new when they find success instead of just pumping out a number 2.