Eurofighter Typhoon shenanigans

  • Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2374 months ago

    When you literally add “if you commit real life treason, we will ban you from our videogame forums” and it still doesn’t work.

  • @DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1784 months ago

    No force is stronger than the autistic urge to correct something that is wrong in the special area of interest.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      Wiki requires citation. It’s pretty easy for a government to have someone go in there and revert it for being uncited.

        • @ochi_chernye@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          Once it’s been declassified. Executive Order 13526 specifies the necessary procedures. Among other things, it states that the original classification authority must set an expiration date, after which the information should be declassified.

          If an earlier date isn’t set, documents will be automatically slated for declassification after 10 years, or a maximum of 25 years(at the discretion of the classifying authority), barring certain exceptions.

          • @Thomrade@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34 months ago

            That’s the american governments rules yes? I’d imagine its not too different for the Italian government.

        • @mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          In the United States, at least, it’s not illegal* for regular citizens to publish leaked documents of whatever status. It is illegal for security clearance holders to access information they’re not cleared for, regardless of where that info is. If an Internet forum allows classified leaks, that would make it difficult for security clearance holders to safely browse that forum.

          • There are statutes on the books that would punish this type of behavior, but they are usually considered to be unenforceable because of the first amendment to the Constitution. Julian Assange was a notable example of a non security clearance holder non-US citizen who was prosecuted under the Espionage Act. (Or at least an attempted prosecution that never quite cleared extradition…)
  • slazer2au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    224 months ago

    What’s the current record for days since leak?

  • erin
    link
    fedilink
    164 months ago

    And yet in that same timeline Okami 2 has been announced 18 years after the release of the first game so as long France postpone its warning shot until the game release and I can finish it, I’m ok with that ^^

    • Rose Thorne(She/Her)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      Oh shit, Okami 2 is finally happening‽

      Can we get an rerelease of Okamiden to go alongside, please? Have all 3 in one place?

      • erin
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        nope, no okamiden since Kamiya is returning as Game Director and he consider Okamiden as a Capcom treason. Okami 2 is officially the direct sequel to Okami replacing Okamiden in the timeline

      • erin
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        yes and it’s one of the best game ever. It has since been rereleased as “Okami HD” on modern platform and the sales on this remake must have been really good since Capcom has greelight the recreation of a whole game studio “Clover”, rehiring the old Okami Game Director and one of the japanese gamedev legend Hideki Kamiya to make the sequel

        • Rayquetzalcoatl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          That sounds promising! I think I bought it preowned for PS2 as a kid but not sure if I ever got round to playing it :o

    • @doktormerlin@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      Simply put: no. It doesn’t make any sense.

      Russia as a whole will not be cut from the internet. North Korea isn’t cut from the internet. The public is. And the public does not need this information

    • nukeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      264 months ago

      Rules 5 & 6. Don’t make me get the spray bottle.

    • Billegh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      Right! You are ruining capitalism! Free is socialism!

      /s

  • @gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24 months ago

    technically this one wasn’t actually classified, it’s just “NATO restricted” so if you live in a NATO country (or even some allied countries iirc) you can access it freely as if it was declassified, you just can’t send it to China or Russia.

    Like you can just freely Google that manual or purchase a physical copy without any sort of checks.

    • @ochi_chernye@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      194 months ago

      That isn’t what NATO Restricted means, at least not in the US—I’m not going to attempt to delve into Hungarian law. It falls under the category of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) established by Executive Order 13556, and codified in DoD Instruction 5200.48

      This information is not freely available to the public, and must be cleared for release according to the procedures detailed in the aforementioned documents, which specify that it should only be disseminated for official government purposes.

        • @grahamja@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          74 months ago

          Unclassified is still a classification level and doesn’t imply that it is meant for broader dissemination; CUI would need approval to be shared. People like you are why everyone has to suffer through annual training every year.

          • clif
            link
            fedilink
            English
            64 months ago

            People like you are why everyone has to suffer through annual training every year.

            This hit me hard and now I’m angry. But it explains why I have to speed run sexual harassment and security training every year even though it seems like a capybara would know better than to do the things being warned against.

        • @frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You literally know nothing John snow, and your ignorance is apparent to anyone with even passing experience in this space. I know this because I only have passing experience in this space related to dumbass cyber security rules.

    • nukeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That’s literally what classified means, that it has a classification. That classification is NATO Restricted.

      • @gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -44 months ago

        As the other reply mentioned, it’s “Controlled Unclassified Information” so it’s in the name, unclassified.

            • nukeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              You’re still wrong and at this point, getting fucking annoying

                • nukeOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  That’s how we enforce Rule 7. By actually knowing what classified means.

            • ...m...
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              …technically, it’s not not classified, it’s unclassified…

              …does unclassified require something to have first been classified?..semantically, certainly, but technically i have no idea…