It seems like displaying an ad at a stop light would be a safety issue since it makes it so you can onky look at the screen while moving.

You know, I was annoyed by that when I had to pay for an out-of-warranty update but now I’m pretty happy that my car is one year too old for automatic updates.

I agree, but I do wonder how many additional companies have quietly “donated” by buying up his meme coin.

The vaccine isn’t 100% effective. If we inject him enough times, he’ll get measles eventually.

It’s in their contract that the results of a polygraph are grounds for dismissal alone. They have no grounds to sue.

As a Coloradan, I agree. Also, New Mexico and Virginia. Probably should also leave PA to Jesus Land.

“Eat the rich” gets flagged too, per another post I just saw.

I like to think this is the case. I’d prefer to think it was the customer who screwed this up rather than the contractor.

So, four… FOUR supreme court justices think it is okay for the US government to fail to pay it’s debts to an AIDS prevention organization for work they had ALREADY DONE!

What the fuck happened to this country?

As a side note, how long before Trump starts calling SCOTUS illigitimate if they keep ruling against him?

You have to be credulous and in a news bubble that tells you he’s only doing good things. Either that or you need to be completely disconnected from the news; I think many are.

He’s got plenty of cronies who can cause chaos while he golfs.

I wonder, how many countries rely on the recommendations of the FDA to determine which vaccine strains to put in their vaccines for the year. Does Canada?

That’s interesting. The vast majority, about 83%, of their shareholders are large institutional shareholders like Vanguard and JP Morgan Chase. Would those be who voted in this?

He also probably thinks that he is going to get a cushy job for his sacrifice. Hopefully Trump refuses to pay in the end, like normal, and this guy speaks out after getting screwed.

What part of the plate has lead? The plate itself or the paint?

I can’t imagine this is a legal way to get rid of federal employees. Hell, I doubt this is a legal way to get rid of ANY employees.

Yeah, I don’t get this. Some of the answers these people gave, when they gave answers, we’re abhorrent. I don’t understand why Republicans were unwilling to push for better nominees.

Yeah, I’ll be 58 when my boy is 19… Gotta get in shape!

I suspect this is the goal here. Cut goverents services, figure out which parts squeak, then hire contractors to do that work at massive profits while either receiving kickbacks or just winning through insider trading.

Ultimately, it probably will lead to higher goverents costs.

NYT wasn’t brave enough to even give a link to the ad in their article.