65% of U.S. adults say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency.

  • Sippy Cup
    link
    fedilink
    162 years ago

    Won’t be good for Democrats either. System is rigged for two parties and two parties only.

    • @eronth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      This would not really change the two party system. All it would mean is that you genuinely need a majority of votes and not the majority of a weird convoluted combo of states.

      • @chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        It would destroy the party system. Suddenly there’s a progressive democrat party and the freedumb caucus becomes it’s own thing.

        I’m game for that.

        • @Kethal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          First-past-the-post voting systems result in two conflicting parties. This would entrench the two party system. The current system is not good, but popular vote is only slightly better.

    • @piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      The difference is in what the voters want.

      Both parties wouldn’t be for it, but liberal voters would be for it. Conservative voters would be against it.